Recurring Payments -- Mostly Review

Recurring payments feel straightforward—until you run into the moment where “monthly amount” doesn’t behave the way you expected.

If you manage giving agreements or payment plans, there’s one distinction that quietly shapes how every installment is applied: Waterfall vs. Allocation. Both approaches are useful, but they produce very different outcomes—and one small mismatch can trigger a frustrating error.

What a Recurring Payment Plan Actually Does

A typical setup looks like this:

The important part: how each payment is distributed depends on whether you’re using Waterfall or Allocation.

Waterfall Payments: “Start at the Top, Then Flow Down”

When no allocation amounts are entered, the plan uses waterfall logic by default.

That means:

If you’re thinking, “So the ordering matters,” you’re exactly right.

How to change the Waterfall order

If you want a different item to be paid off sooner (for example, a security fee before a pledge), you simply reorder the items.

Whatever is at the top gets paid first.

Allocation Payments: “Split Each Payment Across Multiple Items”

Allocation is the alternative approach—and it’s used when you explicitly enter amounts for each category.

Instead of funneling 100% of each payment to the top item, you specify something like:

This is ideal when you want every installment to contribute to multiple balances at once.

The Common “Sum of Allocations Does Not Match the Payment” Error

Here’s the wrinkle that catches people.

If the periodic payment amount doesn’t match the sum of the allocated amounts, the system will stop you from saving and show an error like:

This happens when:

How to fix it

You have only two valid paths:

  1. Reduce one or more allocation amounts so the total equals the payment amount
  2. Increase the periodic payment amount so it matches the sum of allocations

Once the numbers match, the update will succeed.

Switching Between Waterfall and Allocation (Without Rebuilding the Plan)

There’s a simple rule of thumb:

This makes it easy to “flip” between strategies depending on what the payer wants.

It’s Not Just Monthly: Understanding “Periodic” Payments

While most recurring payments are monthly, the same capability supports other schedules.

Examples include:

That’s why it’s more accurate to think in terms of periodic amount rather than “monthly amount.”

Quick Takeaways

If recurring payments ever seem like they’re “misbehaving,” it’s usually not a bug—it’s that the plan is following one of these two rules exactly. Understanding which mode you’re in is the key to predicting (and controlling) where the money goes.

See the full video: https://share.shalomcloud.com/xQuXe7nZ?sa=blog_post